Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators job market in Wyoming

Industry trends, wages and hiring signals.

Data availability

Published industry context is limited

The report below shows the available evidence. Missing figures are not estimated.

Limited published dataCitation

Industries associated with Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators in Wyoming showed broad gains in January to March 2026. Employment in these industries rose 0.4% year over year, compared with a 0.1% increase nationally. The number of establishments rose 9.6% year over year, compared with a 2.2% increase nationally. Average weekly wages across these industries rose 19.9% year over year, compared with a 3.3% increase nationally.

BLS QCEW data for January to March 2026 covers at least 61.7% of the published industry mix for Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators in Wyoming. These are weighted industry-level signals, not direct measures of Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators jobs, current openings, or pay.

Limited local data: at least one local trend covers only 61.7% of this occupation's industry mix. These figures describe the industries with published data. Read each trend alongside its state data coverage.

Limited industry data for arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators in Wyoming

In early 2026, employment in the available industry data was up 0.4% from a year earlier, compared with a 0.1% increase nationwide.

These are industry-wide trends, not a count of jobs in this occupation or current openings.

Indeed job postings · Wyoming

Recent hiring-demand context · separate from the health score

124.1Postings index · February 1, 2020 = 100Observation: Oct 23, 2026
+24.1%Versus the February 2020 baseline
+3.3%Change over about four weeksSep 25, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026

This is statewide demand across all occupations, not demand for this specific job. Postings are not a count of vacancies or hires, and Indeed does not cover the entire labor market.

Source: Indeed Hiring Lab · CC BY 4.0. Seven-day average, seasonally adjusted; publisher refreshes weekly and may revise history. Retrieved Nov 1, 2026 · saved source copy. JobMarketHealth calculates the displayed changes and samples weekly observations for the chart.

Explore states and career fields · Methodology and limits

+0.4%Industry employmentU.S. +0.1%State data coverage: 61.7%
+9.6%EstablishmentsU.S. +2.2%State data coverage: 61.7%
+19.9%Avg. weekly industry wageU.S. +3.3%State data coverage: 61.7%
11,444Represented establishmentsEstablishments in the industries that employ this occupation, not employers hiring itIndustry mix share 89.4%, separate from the data coverage on the trend cards

Industry employment change over time

Year-over-year change for the industries that employ Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators in Wyoming · percentage change

Year-over-year employment change (%) by reference quarter

Latest published values
  • Wyoming · 2026 Q1Not published

The chart will load automatically. Published values remain available in this report.

Every published quarter

BLS does not publish a national quarterly series for this occupation’s industry mix, so only the Wyoming series is shown. The U.S. figure on the cards above is the latest quarter benchmark.

Quarterly year-over-year industry employment change for Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators in Wyoming, with the published state data coverage for each quarter
QuarterWyomingState data coverage
2024 Q2+2.0%100%
2024 Q3+2.5%100%
2024 Q4+2.1%100%
2025 Q1-0.2% Below coverage floor61.7%
2025 Q2+0.1% Below coverage floor64.89%
2025 Q3-0.6% Below coverage floor64.89%
2025 Q40.0% Below coverage floor64.89%
2026 Q1+0.4% Below coverage floor61.7%

Industry mix behind this view

Which industries are weighted into this view. Not a ranking of employers or of job quality.

Industries weighted into the local context for Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators in Wyoming
Industry groupShare of occupation employmentLocal employment changeEstablishmentsAvg. weekly wage
Professional and business services48.4%+0.3%7,311$2,057
State and local Suppressed by BLS30.5%SuppressedSuppressedSuppressed
Private education and health services9.5%+1.9%4,133$1,065
Other services4.2%Not published1,753$1,003
Financial activities3.2%Not published1,720$2,441
Trade, transportation, and utilities2.1%-1.0%5,080$1,097
QCEW release
QCEW 2026 Q1
Data period
January to March 2026
BLS publication date
August 28, 2026
Source verification
Verified September 17, 2026
Industry mix vintage
EP-2025-2035

The publication date above is the official BLS news release date for this reference quarter, linked to the notice. The values match the snapshot independently checked against BLS sources on September 17, 2026. The publication date identifies the quarterly news release, not the exact revision date. The data period above is the quarter the figures describe.

QCEW describes the industries that employ this occupation, not the occupation itself. It is not a count of job openings and is not part of the 0-100 Job Market Health score.

Evidence record

Derived by JobMarketHealth from BLS QCEW + published occupation industry mix. This is occupation-weighted industry context, not direct occupation employment and not a count of current job openings.

Occupation
Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators
SOC code
23-1022
State
Wyoming
QCEW release label
QCEW 2026 Q1
Data period
2026 Q1
State industry employment, year over year
+0.4%State data coverage 61.7%
U.S. benchmark, year over year
+0.1%
Difference from U.S. benchmark
+0.3 percentage pointsPercentage-point gaps use the original published values and are rounded once; subtracting the rounded percentages can give a slightly different result.
Establishments, year over year
+9.6%State data coverage 61.7%
Average weekly industry wage, year over year
+19.9%State data coverage 61.7%
Industry mix vintage
EP-2025-2035
BLS publication date
Aug 28, 2026
Source verification
Verified against the committed source snapshotVerified Sep 17, 2026
Canonical record URL
https://jobmarkethealth.com/occupations/arbitrators-mediators-and-conciliators/wyoming#evidence-record
Derived by
JobMarketHealth from BLS QCEW + published occupation industry mix

AI & this occupation

How AI relates to Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators work

Across 4 research exposure measures, Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators is in the middle technical AI exposure band based on the mean of the available source-specific percentile ranks. Exposure describes how much of the work the studied AI capabilities could technically assist with; it is not a forecast of job loss.

Observed use of Claude for this occupation's tasks is in the higher third of occupations in the Anthropic Economic Index, a dated observed task-exposure benchmark, not conversation share or the share of workers using AI. Its observation window is not recorded in this saved release.

In the task mix derived from the March 27, 2025 Anthropic release, 69.4% followed augmentation patterns (people iterating, validating or learning with AI), based on 7 matched tasks.

JobMarketHealth has not measured an AI effect on this occupation's employment or wages, and these figures do not enter its scores; there is no clear evidence of displacement in the data shown here.

Technical AI exposureMiddle exposureMean of 4 available source-specific percentile ranks (4 measures checked); fixed exposure bands, not a national rank of the composite
Dated Claude task exposureHigher thirdObserved task-exposure benchmark 0.243; observation window not recorded
Business AI use (BTOS Core)24.6%U.S. businesses using AI, two weeks ending 2026-10-04; all industries, not this occupation
Historical task mix (2025)69.4% augmentationMarch 27, 2025 release; 30.6% automation, 7 matched tasks
Measured labor-market effectNot estimatedJobMarketHealth does not attribute employment or wage changes to AI

Exposure measures (kept separate)

  • GPTs are GPTs exposure (β, GPT-4 rated): 0.50 of 1, national percentile 78 (higher third)
  • Microsoft AI applicability: 0.11 of 1, national percentile 37 (middle third)
  • AIOE (Felten, Raj & Seamans): 1.43 (standardized), national percentile 98 (higher third)
  • OECD AI Capability Gap (lower gap = higher potential exposure): gap 7.5 of 23, national percentile 4 (lower third)
OECD capability gap by domain

As published by the OECD: the gap between what the occupation demands (0-5) and current AI capability in each domain. A lower gap means AI is closer to the requirement (higher potential exposure); 0 means AI already meets it or the domain is not relevant.

  • Language: gap 1.50 (demand 4.50 of 5)
  • Social interaction: gap 2.50 (demand 4.50 of 5)
  • Problem solving: gap 2.50 (demand 4.50 of 5)
  • Creativity: gap 0.00 (demand 2.75 of 5)
  • Metacognition & critical thinking: gap 2.25 (demand 4.25 of 5)
  • Knowledge, learning & memory: gap 1.70 (demand 4.70 of 5)
  • Vision: gap 0.00 (demand 0.00 of 5)
  • Manipulation: gap 0.00 (demand 0.00 of 5)
  • Robotic intelligence: gap 0.00 (demand 0.00 of 5)

National context: what businesses used generative AI for

From the Census 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (all industries; businesses whose employees used generative AI). Census did not measure Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators specifically.

  • Writing or editing documents, emails, or communications: 85.4%
  • Searching for information or technical help: 49.9%
  • Interpreting, analyzing, translating, or summarizing documents: 44.6%
  • Information processing, paperwork, or filing: 34.7%

Wyoming context

In the Census BTOS core AI-use question, an estimated 14.4% of Wyoming employer businesses reported using AI in the two weeks ending 2026-10-04 (U.S.: 24.6%).

Separately, the one-time 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (collected 2025-11-17 to 2026-02-08) found 17.0% of Wyoming businesses using AI at that time, and 19.7% reporting that employees used generative AI for work tasks in the prior six months. It describes how AI was being used then, not a trend.

Using each occupation's exposure band and Wyoming employment weights (OEWS May 2025), 24.0% of covered jobs are in occupations in the higher-exposure band. This describes the state's occupation mix, not a measured AI effect.

Exposure and observed usage are separate measures and neither equals job loss. Census BTOS figures are business-level surveys and are not occupation-specific. Sources: GPTs are GPTs occupation exposure; Microsoft Working with AI: AI applicability; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE); OECD AI Exposure Measure (AI Capability Gap); Anthropic Economic Index; Census BTOS Core AI Use; Census BTOS AI Supplement 2025-26. These figures do not affect Job Market Health scores. Explore AI & Jobs · How we use AI data.

How to read this page

QCEW measures employment and wages by industry, not by occupation. We weight those industry conditions using the published industry mix for Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators. These figures describe the industries that employ Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators; they are not direct counts of people working in the occupation or of jobs currently open. This page is not part of the national 0 to 100 Job Market Health score.

Source: BLS QCEW. See the methodology, the national Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators report and about the data.

Compare Wyoming with other statesPublished industry employment, business locations and average weekly industry wages for up to three states, with the national benchmark in percentage points.

Arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators in other states

Choose another state below to explore its available industry context.