What the data shows for career/technical education teachers, middle school in North Carolina
Findings describe the published observation periods shown below. Research published Oct 11, 2026.
01
This occupation is more concentrated in the state
Employment concentration provides a different comparison for career/technical education teachers, middle school in North Carolina. In OEWS May 2025, the published location quotient is 1.41, meaning the occupation's share of employment is 1.41 times its national share. The state estimate is 760 jobs, 4.5% of the national employment estimate for this occupation. It represents 0.15 jobs per thousand jobs in the state's OEWS employment universe. This measures existing employment concentration, not current hiring or future growth.
OEWS employment estimates describe covered wage-and-salary jobs and exclude self-employed workers; location quotients do not measure vacancies or worker demand.
02
Published median pay is below the U.S. median
OEWS May 2025 records a state median annual wage of $52,270 for career/technical education teachers, middle school in North Carolina. Against the national median of $65,030, that is 19.6% lower. A median describes the middle of the distribution and does not include a living-cost adjustment.
The median wage at the upper end of North Carolina's metro comparison is 22.7% above the lower end in OEWS May 2025. The 5 published estimates on a shared wage basis extend from Greensboro-High Point, NC at $46,980 to Durham-Chapel Hill, NC at $57,650. The wage difference alone does not account for living costs or job availability.
Metro estimates may include areas in neighboring states. The comparison covers published metro estimates, not every part of the state.
Findings describe published data and do not establish causes. Methodology
Current market signals
Recent statewide layoff-notice context alongside the published BLS figures below. This signal does not feed the Job Market Health score.
Statewide WARN notices
North Carolina statewide
15 notices in this source
Notice dates from Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026 (UTC), a rolling 90-calendar-day period.
What this means: This is the number of WARN notices with notice dates in this period in North Carolina’s official statewide list. It is a statewide count only, and does not identify any employer.
Notices describe planned workforce changes, not confirmed job losses. Notices may be amended or withdrawn. This statewide context is not occupation-specific and does not affect the Job Market Health score. WARN covers qualifying large layoffs and closures under applicable law, not all layoffs, and thresholds vary by state.
Recent hiring-demand context · separate from the health score
112.3Postings index · February 1, 2020 = 100Observation: Oct 23, 2026
+12.3%Versus the February 2020 baseline
-0.8%Change over about four weeksSep 25, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026
This is statewide demand across all occupations, not demand for this specific job. Postings are not a count of vacancies or hires, and Indeed does not cover the entire labor market.
Source: Indeed Hiring Lab · CC BY 4.0. Seven-day average, seasonally adjusted; publisher refreshes weekly and may revise history. Retrieved Nov 1, 2026 · saved source copy. JobMarketHealth calculates the displayed changes and samples weekly observations for the chart.
+4.1%Industry employmentU.S. +2.2%State data coverage: 100%
+9.0%EstablishmentsU.S. +7.1%State data coverage: 100%
+2.6%Avg. weekly industry wageU.S. +2.3%State data coverage: 100%
42,768Represented establishmentsEstablishments in the industries that employ this occupation, not employers hiring itIndustry mix share 100.0%, separate from the data coverage on the trend cards
Industry employment change over time
Year-over-year change for the industries that employ Career/technical education teachers, middle school in North Carolina · percentage change
Year-over-year employment change (%) by reference quarter
Latest published values
North Carolina · 2026 Q1+4.1%
The chart will load automatically. Published values remain available in this report.
Every published quarter
BLS does not publish a national quarterly series for this occupation’s industry mix, so only the North Carolina series is shown. The U.S. figure on the cards above is the latest quarter benchmark.
Quarterly year-over-year industry employment change for Career/technical education teachers, middle school in North Carolina, with the published state data coverage for each quarter
Quarter
North Carolina
State data coverage
2024 Q2
+4.8%
100%
2024 Q3
+4.1%
100%
2024 Q4
+3.6%
100%
2025 Q1
+3.3%
100%
2025 Q2
+3.4%
100%
2025 Q3
+3.6%
100%
2025 Q4
+3.3%
100%
2026 Q1
+4.1%
100%
Industry mix behind this view
Which industries are weighted into this view. Not a ranking of employers or of job quality.
Industries weighted into the local context for Career/technical education teachers, middle school in North Carolina
The publication date above is the official BLS news release date for this reference quarter, linked to the notice. The values match the snapshot independently checked against BLS sources on September 17, 2026. The publication date identifies the quarterly news release, not the exact revision date. The data period above is the quarter the figures describe.
QCEW describes the industries that employ this occupation, not the occupation itself. It is not a count of job openings and is not part of the 0-100 Job Market Health score.
Evidence record
Derived by JobMarketHealth from BLS QCEW + published occupation industry mix. This is occupation-weighted industry context, not direct occupation employment and not a count of current job openings.
Occupation
Career/technical education teachers, middle school
SOC code
25-2023
State
North Carolina
QCEW release label
QCEW 2026 Q1
Data period
2026 Q1
State industry employment, year over year
+4.1%State data coverage 100%
U.S. benchmark, year over year
+2.2%
Difference from U.S. benchmark
+1.8 percentage pointsPercentage-point gaps use the original published values and are rounded once; subtracting the rounded percentages can give a slightly different result.
Establishments, year over year
+9.0%State data coverage 100%
Average weekly industry wage, year over year
+2.6%State data coverage 100%
Industry mix vintage
EP-2025-2035
BLS publication date
Aug 28, 2026
Source verification
Verified against the committed source snapshotVerified Sep 17, 2026
How AI relates to Career/technical education teachers, middle school work
Across 4 research exposure measures, Career/technical education teachers, middle school is in the middle technical AI exposure band based on the mean of the available source-specific percentile ranks. Exposure describes how much of the work the studied AI capabilities could technically assist with; it is not a forecast of job loss.
The saved Anthropic task-exposure benchmark records a zero index for this occupation. This is not proof of no AI use; the observation window is not recorded in this saved release.
In the task mix derived from the March 27, 2025 Anthropic release, 55.4% followed augmentation patterns (people iterating, validating or learning with AI), based on 12 matched tasks.
JobMarketHealth has not measured an AI effect on this occupation's employment or wages, and these figures do not enter its scores; there is no clear evidence of displacement in the data shown here.
Technical AI exposureMiddle exposureMean of 4 available source-specific percentile ranks (4 measures checked); fixed exposure bands, not a national rank of the compositeDated Claude task exposureLower thirdObserved task-exposure benchmark 0.000; observation window not recordedBusiness AI use (BTOS Core)24.6%U.S. businesses using AI, two weeks ending 2026-10-04; all industries, not this occupationHistorical task mix (2025)55.4% augmentationMarch 27, 2025 release; 44.6% automation, 12 matched tasksMeasured labor-market effectNot estimatedJobMarketHealth does not attribute employment or wage changes to AI
Exposure measures (kept separate)
GPTs are GPTs exposure (β, GPT-4 rated): 0.32 of 1, national percentile 50 (middle third)
Microsoft AI applicability: 0.18 of 1, national percentile 63 (middle third)
OECD AI Capability Gap (lower gap = higher potential exposure): gap 5.4 of 23, national percentile 22 (lower third)
OECD capability gap by domain
As published by the OECD: the gap between what the occupation demands (0-5) and current AI capability in each domain. A lower gap means AI is closer to the requirement (higher potential exposure); 0 means AI already meets it or the domain is not relevant.
Language: gap 1.25 (demand 4.25 of 5)
Social interaction: gap 2.00 (demand 4.00 of 5)
Problem solving: gap 1.75 (demand 3.75 of 5)
Creativity: gap 0.00 (demand 2.65 of 5)
Metacognition & critical thinking: gap 1.60 (demand 3.60 of 5)
Knowledge, learning & memory: gap 0.95 (demand 3.95 of 5)
Vision: gap 0.00 (demand 2.95 of 5)
Manipulation: gap 0.35 (demand 2.35 of 5)
Robotic intelligence: gap 0.65 (demand 2.65 of 5)
National context: what businesses used generative AI for
From the Census 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (all industries; businesses whose employees used generative AI). Census did not measure Career/technical education teachers, middle school specifically.
Writing or editing documents, emails, or communications: 85.4%
Searching for information or technical help: 49.9%
Interpreting, analyzing, translating, or summarizing documents: 44.6%
Information processing, paperwork, or filing: 34.7%
North Carolina context
In the Census BTOS core AI-use question, an estimated 29.6% of North Carolina employer businesses reported using AI in the two weeks ending 2026-10-04 (U.S.: 24.6%).
Separately, the one-time 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (collected 2025-11-17 to 2026-02-08) found 18.9% of North Carolina businesses using AI at that time, and 21.5% reporting that employees used generative AI for work tasks in the prior six months. It describes how AI was being used then, not a trend.
Using each occupation's exposure band and North Carolina employment weights (OEWS May 2025), 30.6% of covered jobs are in occupations in the higher-exposure band. This describes the state's occupation mix, not a measured AI effect.
Exposure and observed usage are separate measures and neither equals job loss. Census BTOS figures are business-level surveys and are not occupation-specific. Sources: GPTs are GPTs occupation exposure; Microsoft Working with AI: AI applicability; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE); OECD AI Exposure Measure (AI Capability Gap); Anthropic Economic Index; Census BTOS Core AI Use; Census BTOS AI Supplement 2025-26. These figures do not affect Job Market Health scores. Explore AI & Jobs · How we use AI data.
How to read this page
QCEW measures employment and wages by industry, not by occupation. We weight those industry conditions using the published industry mix for Career/technical education teachers, middle school. These figures describe the industries that employ Career/technical education teachers, middle school; they are not direct counts of people working in the occupation or of jobs currently open. This page is not part of the national 0 to 100 Job Market Health score.
Compare North Carolina with other statesPublished industry employment, business locations and average weekly industry wages for up to three states, with the national benchmark in percentage points.
Career/technical education teachers, middle school in other states
Choose another state below to explore its available industry context.