Couriers and messengers job market in District of Columbia

Occupation pay

What Couriers and messengers earn in District of Columbia

BLS OEWS occupation-level pay estimates for this role — separate from the industry wage trends used elsewhere in this report.

BLS OEWS source

Median annual wage

$45,210District of Columbia
Middle 50% of published wages
$41,190 – $49,030
U.S. median annual wage
$39,200
Reference period
May 2025

The middle 50% is the 25th-to-75th percentile wage range, not an experience-level band. Suppressed or unavailable BLS values remain unpublished rather than being estimated.

Pay around District of Columbia

How median pay varies by metro area

Published BLS OEWS metro estimates for Couriers and messengers, compared with the District of Columbia median of $45,210.

District of Columbia median$45,210
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV$44,840−0.8% vs. state
Middle 50%$40,630 – $48,740Published employment1,010

Areas are ordered by published median wage for readability, not as an overall job-market ranking. The vertical marker is the District of Columbia median. Some BLS metropolitan areas cross state lines, so a metro estimate can cover workers in more than one state.

Local research

What the data shows for couriers and messengers in District of Columbia

Findings describe the published observation periods shown below. Research published Oct 11, 2026.

This occupation is less concentrated in the state

Couriers and messengers account for 0.38 times their national share of employment in District of Columbia, according to OEWS May 2025. This is the published location quotient. The state estimate is 120 jobs, 0.2% of the national employment estimate for this occupation. It represents 0.17 jobs per thousand jobs in the state's OEWS employment universe. Concentration describes employment share, not current hiring or future growth.

OEWS May 2025 · BLS OEWS

OEWS employment estimates describe covered wage-and-salary jobs and exclude self-employed workers; location quotients do not measure vacancies or worker demand.

Industry groups are pulling in opposite directions

The overall industry figure masks differing movements among the leading industry groups associated with this occupation in District of Columbia. The groups examined cover 87.7% of its national industry mix. In January to March 2026, year-over-year employment changed +1.1% in Private education and health services and -2.5% in Trade, transportation, and utilities.

January to March 2026 · BLS QCEW

Published median pay is above the U.S. median

A 15.3% difference separates District of Columbia's median annual wage for couriers and messengers from the U.S. median in OEWS May 2025. At $45,210, the state median is above the national figure of $39,200. The estimates describe the middle of each wage distribution, without a living-cost adjustment.

OEWS May 2025 · BLS OEWS

Employment and establishment counts moved apart

The establishment measure gives a different direction from the employment measure in District of Columbia in January to March 2026. For the industries that employ this occupation, establishments changed +2.3% year over year and employment changed -1.3%. The figures describe how the two measures diverged, without identifying a reason.

January to March 2026 · BLS QCEW

Industry measures describe the industries associated with this occupation. They are not direct occupation employment, current openings or a state-level Job Market Health score. Findings describe published data and do not establish causes. Methodology

Current market signals

Recent statewide layoff-notice context alongside the published BLS figures below. This signal does not feed the Job Market Health score.

Listed WARN records in District of Columbia

Partial list

Partial list. Partial listed-record coverage: DOES posts WARN notices on its annual table when received, but the table does not certify that every notice is listed or how current it is. Rows are dated by the published Notice Date (the day DOES received the notice); effective layoff dates and ranges are kept as published and never used as notice dates. "TBD" and amended worker counts are unknown. No month or District total is treated as complete; missing records are unknown, not zero.

Notices listed in the DOES 2026 WARN notifications table — observed, not complete monthly totals
Month of notice dateListed notices
Feb 20262
Mar 20262
Apr 20263
May 20261
Jul 20264
Aug 20262
Sep 20263
Listed notices counted17

Statewide, current-month and three-month totals are unavailable. Months not shown are unknown, not zero. Effective layoff dates are not used as notice dates.

District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

Source last checked . This check does not certify a newly published report.

Indeed job postings · District of Columbia

Recent hiring-demand context · separate from the health score

70.6Postings index · February 1, 2020 = 100Observation: Oct 23, 2026
-29.4%Versus the February 2020 baseline
-0.9%Change over about four weeksSep 25, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026

This is statewide demand across all occupations, not demand for this specific job. Postings are not a count of vacancies or hires, and Indeed does not cover the entire labor market.

Source: Indeed Hiring Lab · CC BY 4.0. Seven-day average, seasonally adjusted; publisher refreshes weekly and may revise history. Retrieved Nov 1, 2026 · saved source copy. JobMarketHealth calculates the displayed changes and samples weekly observations for the chart.

Explore states and career fields · Methodology and limits

-1.3%Industry employmentU.S. +0.5%State data coverage: 89.43%
+2.3%EstablishmentsU.S. +3.4%State data coverage: 89.43%
+6.6%Avg. weekly industry wageU.S. +3.0%State data coverage: 89.43%
27,833Represented establishmentsEstablishments in the industries that employ this occupation, not employers hiring itIndustry mix share 88.8%, separate from the data coverage on the trend cards

Industry employment change over time

Year-over-year change for the industries that employ Couriers and messengers in District of Columbia · percentage change

Year-over-year employment change (%) by reference quarter

Latest published values
  • District of Columbia · 2026 Q1-1.3%

The chart will load automatically. Published values remain available in this report.

Every published quarter

BLS does not publish a national quarterly series for this occupation’s industry mix, so only the District of Columbia series is shown. The U.S. figure on the cards above is the latest quarter benchmark.

Quarterly year-over-year industry employment change for Couriers and messengers in District of Columbia, with the published state data coverage for each quarter
QuarterDistrict of ColumbiaState data coverage
2024 Q2+0.5%100%
2024 Q3+0.6%100%
2024 Q40.0%98.83%
2025 Q1+0.2%89.43%
2025 Q20.0%94.42%
2025 Q3-0.8%94.42%
2025 Q4-0.5%94.42%
2026 Q1-1.3%89.43%

Industry mix behind this view

Which industries are weighted into this view. Not a ranking of employers or of job quality.

Industries weighted into the local context for Couriers and messengers in District of Columbia
Industry groupShare of occupation employmentLocal employment changeEstablishmentsAvg. weekly wage
Private education and health services38.1%+1.1%7,236$1,674
Trade, transportation, and utilities33.3%-2.5%2,020$1,480
Professional and business services16.2%-4.2%18,577$3,573
Financial activities4.3%Not published3,555$5,500
State and local Suppressed by BLS3.0%SuppressedSuppressedSuppressed
Manufacturing Suppressed by BLS1.2%SuppressedSuppressedSuppressed
QCEW release
QCEW 2026 Q1
Data period
January to March 2026
BLS publication date
August 28, 2026
Source verification
Verified September 17, 2026
Industry mix vintage
EP-2025-2035

The publication date above is the official BLS news release date for this reference quarter, linked to the notice. The values match the snapshot independently checked against BLS sources on September 17, 2026. The publication date identifies the quarterly news release, not the exact revision date. The data period above is the quarter the figures describe.

QCEW describes the industries that employ this occupation, not the occupation itself. It is not a count of job openings and is not part of the 0-100 Job Market Health score.

Evidence record

Derived by JobMarketHealth from BLS QCEW + published occupation industry mix. This is occupation-weighted industry context, not direct occupation employment and not a count of current job openings.

Occupation
Couriers and messengers
SOC code
43-5021
State
District of Columbia
QCEW release label
QCEW 2026 Q1
Data period
2026 Q1
State industry employment, year over year
-1.3%State data coverage 89.43%
U.S. benchmark, year over year
+0.5%
Difference from U.S. benchmark
-1.8 percentage pointsPercentage-point gaps use the original published values and are rounded once; subtracting the rounded percentages can give a slightly different result.
Establishments, year over year
+2.3%State data coverage 89.43%
Average weekly industry wage, year over year
+6.6%State data coverage 89.43%
Industry mix vintage
EP-2025-2035
BLS publication date
Aug 28, 2026
Source verification
Verified against the committed source snapshotVerified Sep 17, 2026
Canonical record URL
https://jobmarkethealth.com/occupations/couriers-and-messengers/district-of-columbia#evidence-record
Derived by
JobMarketHealth from BLS QCEW + published occupation industry mix

AI & this occupation

How AI relates to Couriers and messengers work

Across 4 research exposure measures, Couriers and messengers is in the middle technical AI exposure band based on the mean of the available source-specific percentile ranks. Exposure describes how much of the work the studied AI capabilities could technically assist with; it is not a forecast of job loss.

Observed use of Claude for this occupation's tasks is in the middle third of occupations in the Anthropic Economic Index, a dated observed task-exposure benchmark, not conversation share or the share of workers using AI. Its observation window is not recorded in this saved release.

JobMarketHealth has not measured an AI effect on this occupation's employment or wages, and these figures do not enter its scores; there is no clear evidence of displacement in the data shown here.

Technical AI exposureMiddle exposureMean of 4 available source-specific percentile ranks (4 measures checked); fixed exposure bands, not a national rank of the composite
Dated Claude task exposureMiddle thirdObserved task-exposure benchmark 0.041; observation window not recorded
Business AI use (BTOS Core)24.6%U.S. businesses using AI, two weeks ending 2026-10-04; all industries, not this occupation
Historical task mix (2025)Not enough tasksFewer than 3 observed tasks
Measured labor-market effectNot estimatedJobMarketHealth does not attribute employment or wage changes to AI

Exposure measures (kept separate)

  • GPTs are GPTs exposure (β, GPT-4 rated): 0.31 of 1, national percentile 48 (middle third)
  • Microsoft AI applicability: 0.13 of 1, national percentile 44 (middle third)
  • AIOE (Felten, Raj & Seamans): -0.96 (standardized), national percentile 21 (lower third)
  • OECD AI Capability Gap (lower gap = higher potential exposure): gap 1.4 of 23, national percentile 81 (higher third)
OECD capability gap by domain

As published by the OECD: the gap between what the occupation demands (0-5) and current AI capability in each domain. A lower gap means AI is closer to the requirement (higher potential exposure); 0 means AI already meets it or the domain is not relevant.

  • Language: gap 0.00 (demand 2.10 of 5)
  • Social interaction: gap 0.20 (demand 2.20 of 5)
  • Problem solving: gap 0.00 (demand 2.00 of 5)
  • Creativity: gap 0.00 (demand 0.45 of 5)
  • Metacognition & critical thinking: gap 0.00 (demand 2.00 of 5)
  • Knowledge, learning & memory: gap 0.00 (demand 2.10 of 5)
  • Vision: gap 0.15 (demand 3.15 of 5)
  • Manipulation: gap 0.55 (demand 2.55 of 5)
  • Robotic intelligence: gap 1.30 (demand 3.30 of 5)

National context: what businesses used generative AI for

From the Census 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (all industries; businesses whose employees used generative AI). Census did not measure Couriers and messengers specifically.

  • Writing or editing documents, emails, or communications: 85.4%
  • Searching for information or technical help: 49.9%
  • Interpreting, analyzing, translating, or summarizing documents: 44.6%
  • Information processing, paperwork, or filing: 34.7%

District of Columbia context

In the Census BTOS core AI-use question, an estimated 34.1% of District of Columbia employer businesses reported using AI in the two weeks ending 2026-10-04 (U.S.: 24.6%).

Separately, the one-time 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (collected 2025-11-17 to 2026-02-08) found 23.0% of District of Columbia businesses using AI at that time, and 24.6% reporting that employees used generative AI for work tasks in the prior six months. It describes how AI was being used then, not a trend.

Using each occupation's exposure band and District of Columbia employment weights (OEWS May 2025), 40.3% of covered jobs are in occupations in the higher-exposure band. This describes the state's occupation mix, not a measured AI effect.

Exposure and observed usage are separate measures and neither equals job loss. Census BTOS figures are business-level surveys and are not occupation-specific. Sources: GPTs are GPTs occupation exposure; Microsoft Working with AI: AI applicability; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE); OECD AI Exposure Measure (AI Capability Gap); Anthropic Economic Index; Census BTOS Core AI Use; Census BTOS AI Supplement 2025-26. These figures do not affect Job Market Health scores. Explore AI & Jobs · How we use AI data.

How to read this page

QCEW measures employment and wages by industry, not by occupation. We weight those industry conditions using the published industry mix for Couriers and messengers. These figures describe the industries that employ Couriers and messengers; they are not direct counts of people working in the occupation or of jobs currently open. This page is not part of the national 0 to 100 Job Market Health score.

Source: BLS QCEW. See the methodology, the national Couriers and messengers report and about the data.

Compare District of Columbia with other statesPublished industry employment, business locations and average weekly industry wages for up to three states, with the national benchmark in percentage points.

Couriers and messengers in other states

Choose another state below to explore its available industry context.