Compliance officers job market in South Dakota

Industry trends, wages and hiring signals.

Data availability

Published industry context is limited

The report below shows the available evidence. Missing figures are not estimated.

Limited published dataCitation

Occupation pay

What Compliance officers earn in South Dakota

BLS OEWS occupation-level pay estimates for this role — separate from the industry wage trends used elsewhere in this report.

BLS OEWS source

Median annual wage

$72,630South Dakota
Middle 50% of published wages
$64,020 – $85,760
U.S. median annual wage
$80,730
Reference period
May 2025

The middle 50% is the 25th-to-75th percentile wage range, not an experience-level band. Suppressed or unavailable BLS values remain unpublished rather than being estimated.

Pay around South Dakota

How median pay varies by metro area

Published BLS OEWS metro estimates for Compliance officers, compared with the South Dakota median of $72,630.

South Dakota median$72,630
Sioux Falls, SD-MN$77,030+6.1% vs. state
Middle 50%$65,660 – $94,600Published employment520
Rapid City, SD$75,160+3.5% vs. state
Middle 50%$61,400 – $97,470Published employment120
Sioux City, IA-NE-SD$72,610Same as state at displayed precision
Middle 50%$63,130 – $77,400Published employment150

Areas are ordered by published median wage for readability, not as an overall job-market ranking. The vertical marker is the South Dakota median. Some BLS metropolitan areas cross state lines, so a metro estimate can cover workers in more than one state.

Limited local data: at least one local trend covers only 62.85% of this occupation's industry mix. These figures describe the industries with published data. Read each trend alongside its state data coverage.

Latest interpretation

What stands out for compliance officers in South Dakota

The clearest signals from the latest validated occupation-pay data available for this page.

Published occupation pay is below the U.S. median

The published median annual wage for Compliance officers in South Dakota is $72,630, 10.0% below the U.S. median of $80,730.

BLS OEWS occupation pay

Published metro pay varies within the state view

Among published metro estimates, Sioux Falls, SD-MN has the highest median at $77,030, while Sioux City, IA-NE-SD is $72,610. Some metro areas cross state lines.

BLS OEWS metro occupation pay

Industry measures describe the industries associated with this occupation. They are not direct occupation employment, current openings or a state-level Job Market Health score.

Current market signals

Recent statewide layoff-notice context alongside the published BLS figures below. This signal does not feed the Job Market Health score.

Statewide layoff-notice filings

South Dakota statewide

1 notice in this source

Notice dates from Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026 (UTC), a rolling 90-calendar-day period.

What this means: These are statewide totals from notices dated in this period in South Dakota’s official tracking system. Reported positions are the counts published in those notices, not a count of people confirmed to have lost their jobs. No employer is identified.

Notices describe planned workforce changes, not confirmed job losses. Notices may be amended or withdrawn. This statewide context is not occupation-specific and does not affect the Job Market Health score. South Dakota’s state tracking system also records smaller Rapid Response events that fall below federal WARN thresholds, so it is not a list of federal WARN filings only.

South Dakota Department of Labor and Regulation About WARN data

Source last checked

Indeed job postings · South Dakota

Recent hiring-demand context · separate from the health score

145.9Postings index · February 1, 2020 = 100Observation: Oct 23, 2026
+45.9%Versus the February 2020 baseline
+1.1%Change over about four weeksSep 25, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026

This is statewide demand across all occupations, not demand for this specific job. Postings are not a count of vacancies or hires, and Indeed does not cover the entire labor market.

Source: Indeed Hiring Lab · CC BY 4.0. Seven-day average, seasonally adjusted; publisher refreshes weekly and may revise history. Retrieved Nov 1, 2026 · saved source copy. JobMarketHealth calculates the displayed changes and samples weekly observations for the chart.

Explore states and career fields · Methodology and limits

-1.7%Industry employmentU.S. -1.3%State data coverage: 62.85%
+0.2%EstablishmentsU.S. +1.8%State data coverage: 62.85%
+5.3%Avg. weekly industry wageU.S. +4.7%State data coverage: 62.85%
17,001Represented establishmentsEstablishments in the industries that employ this occupation, not employers hiring itIndustry mix share 84.3%, separate from the data coverage on the trend cards

Industry employment change over time

Year-over-year change for the industries that employ Compliance officers in South Dakota · percentage change

Year-over-year employment change (%) by reference quarter

Latest published values
  • South Dakota · 2026 Q1Not published

The chart will load automatically. Published values remain available in this report.

Every published quarter

BLS does not publish a national quarterly series for this occupation’s industry mix, so only the South Dakota series is shown. The U.S. figure on the cards above is the latest quarter benchmark.

Quarterly year-over-year industry employment change for Compliance officers in South Dakota, with the published state data coverage for each quarter
QuarterSouth DakotaState data coverage
2024 Q2+0.9%100%
2024 Q3+0.9%100%
2024 Q4+0.7%100%
2025 Q1+0.7% Below coverage floor66.19%
2025 Q2-0.3% Below coverage floor76.76%
2025 Q3-0.6% Below coverage floor76.76%
2025 Q4-1.3% Below coverage floor76.76%
2026 Q1-1.7% Below coverage floor62.85%

Industry mix behind this view

Which industries are weighted into this view. Not a ranking of employers or of job quality.

Industries weighted into the local context for Compliance officers in South Dakota
Industry groupShare of occupation employmentLocal employment changeEstablishmentsAvg. weekly wage
Professional and business services19.5%-0.5%8,444$1,671
State and local Suppressed by BLS18.6%SuppressedSuppressedSuppressed
Federal16.5%-7.7%658$1,900
Financial activities13.3%Not published4,266$2,029
Private education and health services12.8%+2.6%3,633$1,327
Trade, transportation, and utilities4.7%-0.2%8,546$1,068
QCEW release
QCEW 2026 Q1
Data period
January to March 2026
BLS publication date
August 28, 2026
Source verification
Verified September 17, 2026
Industry mix vintage
EP-2025-2035

The publication date above is the official BLS news release date for this reference quarter, linked to the notice. The values match the snapshot independently checked against BLS sources on September 17, 2026. The publication date identifies the quarterly news release, not the exact revision date. The data period above is the quarter the figures describe.

QCEW describes the industries that employ this occupation, not the occupation itself. It is not a count of job openings and is not part of the 0-100 Job Market Health score.

Evidence record

Derived by JobMarketHealth from BLS QCEW + published occupation industry mix. This is occupation-weighted industry context, not direct occupation employment and not a count of current job openings.

Occupation
Compliance officers
SOC code
13-1041
State
South Dakota
QCEW release label
QCEW 2026 Q1
Data period
2026 Q1
State industry employment, year over year
-1.7%State data coverage 62.85%
U.S. benchmark, year over year
-1.3%
Difference from U.S. benchmark
-0.4 percentage pointsPercentage-point gaps use the original published values and are rounded once; subtracting the rounded percentages can give a slightly different result.
Establishments, year over year
+0.2%State data coverage 62.85%
Average weekly industry wage, year over year
+5.3%State data coverage 62.85%
Industry mix vintage
EP-2025-2035
BLS publication date
Aug 28, 2026
Source verification
Verified against the committed source snapshotVerified Sep 17, 2026
Canonical record URL
https://jobmarkethealth.com/occupations/compliance-officers/south-dakota#evidence-record
Derived by
JobMarketHealth from BLS QCEW + published occupation industry mix

AI & this occupation

How AI relates to Compliance officers work

Across 4 research exposure measures, Compliance officers is in the higher technical AI exposure band based on the mean of the available source-specific percentile ranks. Exposure describes how much of the work the studied AI capabilities could technically assist with; it is not a forecast of job loss.

Observed use of Claude for this occupation's tasks is in the higher third of occupations in the Anthropic Economic Index, a dated observed task-exposure benchmark, not conversation share or the share of workers using AI. Its observation window is not recorded in this saved release.

In the task mix derived from the March 27, 2025 Anthropic release, 59.4% followed augmentation patterns (people iterating, validating or learning with AI), based on 12 matched tasks.

JobMarketHealth has not measured an AI effect on this occupation's employment or wages, and these figures do not enter its scores; there is no clear evidence of displacement in the data shown here.

Technical AI exposureHigher exposureMean of 4 available source-specific percentile ranks (4 measures checked); fixed exposure bands, not a national rank of the composite
Dated Claude task exposureHigher thirdObserved task-exposure benchmark 0.121; observation window not recorded
Business AI use (BTOS Core)24.6%U.S. businesses using AI, two weeks ending 2026-10-04; all industries, not this occupation
Historical task mix (2025)59.4% augmentationMarch 27, 2025 release; 40.6% automation, 12 matched tasks
Measured labor-market effectNot estimatedJobMarketHealth does not attribute employment or wage changes to AI

Exposure measures (kept separate)

  • GPTs are GPTs exposure (β, GPT-4 rated): 0.68 of 1, national percentile 95 (higher third)
  • Microsoft AI applicability: 0.20 of 1, national percentile 69 (higher third)
  • AIOE (Felten, Raj & Seamans): 0.70 (standardized), national percentile 66 (middle third)
  • OECD AI Capability Gap (lower gap = higher potential exposure): gap 3.0 of 23, national percentile 55 (middle third)
OECD capability gap by domain

As published by the OECD: the gap between what the occupation demands (0-5) and current AI capability in each domain. A lower gap means AI is closer to the requirement (higher potential exposure); 0 means AI already meets it or the domain is not relevant.

  • Language: gap 0.80 (demand 3.80 of 5)
  • Social interaction: gap 1.30 (demand 3.30 of 5)
  • Problem solving: gap 1.05 (demand 3.05 of 5)
  • Creativity: gap 0.00 (demand 1.40 of 5)
  • Metacognition & critical thinking: gap 1.30 (demand 3.30 of 5)
  • Knowledge, learning & memory: gap 0.45 (demand 3.45 of 5)
  • Vision: gap 0.00 (demand 2.45 of 5)
  • Manipulation: gap 0.00 (demand 0.00 of 5)
  • Robotic intelligence: gap 0.00 (demand 0.95 of 5)

National context: what businesses used generative AI for

From the Census 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (all industries; businesses whose employees used generative AI). Census did not measure Compliance officers specifically.

  • Writing or editing documents, emails, or communications: 85.4%
  • Searching for information or technical help: 49.9%
  • Interpreting, analyzing, translating, or summarizing documents: 44.6%
  • Information processing, paperwork, or filing: 34.7%

South Dakota context

In the Census BTOS core AI-use question, an estimated 17.0% of South Dakota employer businesses reported using AI in the two weeks ending 2026-10-04 (U.S.: 24.6%).

Separately, the one-time 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (collected 2025-11-17 to 2026-02-08) found 15.2% of South Dakota businesses using AI at that time, and 20.8% reporting that employees used generative AI for work tasks in the prior six months. It describes how AI was being used then, not a trend.

Using each occupation's exposure band and South Dakota employment weights (OEWS May 2025), 28.1% of covered jobs are in occupations in the higher-exposure band. This describes the state's occupation mix, not a measured AI effect.

Exposure and observed usage are separate measures and neither equals job loss. Census BTOS figures are business-level surveys and are not occupation-specific. Sources: GPTs are GPTs occupation exposure; Microsoft Working with AI: AI applicability; AI Occupational Exposure (AIOE); OECD AI Exposure Measure (AI Capability Gap); Anthropic Economic Index; Census BTOS Core AI Use; Census BTOS AI Supplement 2025-26. These figures do not affect Job Market Health scores. Explore AI & Jobs · How we use AI data.

How to read this page

QCEW measures employment and wages by industry, not by occupation. We weight those industry conditions using the published industry mix for Compliance officers. These figures describe the industries that employ Compliance officers; they are not direct counts of people working in the occupation or of jobs currently open. This page is not part of the national 0 to 100 Job Market Health score.

Source: BLS QCEW. See the methodology, the national Compliance officers report and about the data.

Compare South Dakota with other statesPublished industry employment, business locations and average weekly industry wages for up to three states, with the national benchmark in percentage points.

Compliance officers in other states

Choose another state below to explore its available industry context.