JobMarketHealth

Database administrators

SOC 15-1242 · 15-0000 · Score reference month August 2026

Administer, test, and implement computer databases, applying knowledge of database management systems. Coordinate changes to computer databases. Identify, investigate, and resolve database performance issues, database capacity, and database scalability. May plan, coordinate, and implement security measures to safeguard computer databases.

In short

The national Job Market Health score is in the Weak band for August 2026.

How the score is builtData sources

Job Market Health score

27/ 100
Weak

Stable · -1

Confidence
High
Restated score
27
Methodology
v1.0
Geography
US
  • At least 90% of required inputs and occupation-industry mapping are covered.

Job Market Health scores are derived indicators based on published data, informational only, not a forecast or guarantee.

$104,620Median annual wageOEWS May 2025
3,300Projected annual openingsBLS Employment Projections 2025-2035
-0.1%Projected growth2025–2035
69,990Total employmentOEWS May 2025

Latest interpretation

What stands out for database administrators

The clearest signals from the latest validated score, outlook and metro data.

Current demand is the strongest component

Current demand scores 31/100, compared with 18/100 for long-term outlook, a 13-point difference.

JobMarketHealth score components

Long-term employment is projected to contract

BLS projects 3,300 average annual openings and -0.1% employment growth from 2025 to 2035. Projected openings are a modeled annual average, not vacancies open today.

BLS Employment Projections

Largest published metro market

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV has the largest published metro employment count for database administrators, at 3,730 jobs. The next-largest published metro is New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ with 3,630 jobs. This measures employment scale, not market quality.

BLS OEWS

Local market context

QCEW industry conditions for this occupation’s employment mix

Choose a state to see how the industries that employ this occupation are performing locally.

Browse local market context by state

Choose any state from the menu above to explore its available industry context.

How to read this section

QCEW measures employment and wages by industry, not by occupation. We weight those industry conditions using the published industry mix for this occupation. These figures describe the industries that employ this occupation; they are not direct counts of people working in the occupation or jobs currently open.

Source: BLS QCEW. This section is not part of the national 0 to 100 Job Market Health score. See the methodology.

Compare states for database administratorsSide-by-side published industry conditions for two or three states. There is no state-level health score; the 0 to 100 score is national.

How to read this page

The score is a national composite from 0 to 100 that weights near term hiring demand at 50 percent, the occupation's own employment fundamentals at 30 percent, and long-term outlook at 20 percent. Wages and occupation profile details are context shown alongside it, not score inputs. See the full methodology.

Median annual wage and metro employment come from BLS OEWS, which is annual. Projected annual openings and projected growth come from BLS Employment Projections and describe the published projection horizon, so they are not a count of jobs open today. Values shown as not published are suppressed by the source rather than filled in here.

Job Market Health trend

Published composite score · 0–100 · by reference month

Latest published values
  • Aug 2627 / 100
View values: Job Market Health history
Job Market Health history
Reference monthScore / 100
Jan 2533
Feb 2532
Mar 2531
Apr 2532
May 2533
Jun 2531
Jul 2528
Aug 2526
Sep 2526
Oct 2525
Nov 2525
Dec 2525
Jan 2626
Feb 2626
Mar 2625
Apr 2625
May 2628
Jun 2629
Jul 2628
Aug 2627

Score components

The three published inputs behind the composite · each 0–100

Current demand31 / 100
Occupation fundamentals25 / 100
Long-term outlook18 / 100

Largest metro markets by employment

OEWS employment count, where the jobs are, not a quality ranking

OEWS May 2025. These occupation counts describe the survey reference period.

Linked metro names open overall job-market profiles.

Compare cities for this career →

Employment · number of jobs

  • Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV3,730
  • New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ3,630
  • Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX2,430
  • Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA2,280
  • Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH1,910
  • Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN1,870
  • Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA1,780
  • Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD1,580
  • San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA1,470
  • Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD1,190
Largest metro markets by employment
Metro areaEmploymentJobs per 1,000Median annual wage
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV3,7301.19$108,750
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ3,6300.38$121,550
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX2,4300.60$122,390
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA2,2800.36$112,540
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH1,9100.71$132,370
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN1,8700.41$109,680
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA1,7800.62$110,950
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD1,5800.55$104,930
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA1,4700.62$127,760
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD1,1900.88$123,730

Education & training

Typical entry requirements · BLS Employment Projections 2025-2035

Typical education
Bachelor's degree
Work experience
None
On-the-job training
None
Projected employment
74,900 jobs

Top skills

Occupation profile · O*NET 31.0 Database

  • Complex Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Active Listening
  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • Reading Comprehension
  • Active Learning
  • Programming
  • Speaking
  • Monitoring
  • Writing

Also known as: Database Administration Manager, Database Administrator (DBA), Database Analyst, Database Coordinator, Database Engineer, Database Manager

AI & this occupation

How AI relates to Database administrators work

Across 3 research exposure measures, Database administrators is in the higher technical AI exposure band based on the mean of the available source-specific percentile ranks. Exposure describes how much of the work the studied AI capabilities could technically assist with; it is not a forecast of job loss.

Observed use of Claude for this occupation's tasks is in the higher third of occupations in the Anthropic Economic Index, a dated observed task-exposure benchmark, not conversation share or the share of workers using AI. Its observation window is not recorded in this saved release.

JobMarketHealth has not measured an AI effect on this occupation's employment or wages, and these figures do not enter its scores; there is no clear evidence of displacement in the data shown here.

Technical AI exposureHigher exposureMean of 3 available source-specific percentile ranks (4 measures checked); fixed exposure bands, not a national rank of the composite
Dated Claude task exposureHigher thirdObserved task-exposure benchmark 0.332; observation window not recorded
Business AI use (BTOS Core)24.6%U.S. businesses using AI, two weeks ending 2026-10-04; all industries, not this occupation
Historical task mix (2025)Not enough tasksFewer than 3 observed tasks
Measured labor-market effectNot estimatedJobMarketHealth does not attribute employment or wage changes to AI

Exposure measures (kept separate)

  • GPTs are GPTs exposure (β, GPT-4 rated): 0.94 of 1, national percentile 99 (higher third)
  • Microsoft AI applicability: 0.30 of 1, national percentile 88 (higher third)
  • OECD AI Capability Gap (lower gap = higher potential exposure): gap 1.5 of 23, national percentile 80 (higher third)
OECD capability gap by domain

As published by the OECD: the gap between what the occupation demands (0-5) and current AI capability in each domain. A lower gap means AI is closer to the requirement (higher potential exposure); 0 means AI already meets it or the domain is not relevant.

  • Language: gap 0.05 (demand 3.05 of 5)
  • Social interaction: gap 0.25 (demand 2.25 of 5)
  • Problem solving: gap 0.95 (demand 2.95 of 5)
  • Creativity: gap 0.00 (demand 2.00 of 5)
  • Metacognition & critical thinking: gap 1.05 (demand 3.05 of 5)
  • Knowledge, learning & memory: gap 0.05 (demand 3.05 of 5)
  • Vision: gap 0.00 (demand 0.00 of 5)
  • Manipulation: gap 0.00 (demand 0.00 of 5)
  • Robotic intelligence: gap 0.00 (demand 0.00 of 5)

National context: what businesses used generative AI for

From the Census 2025-26 BTOS AI Supplement (all industries; businesses whose employees used generative AI). Census did not measure Database administrators specifically.

  • Writing or editing documents, emails, or communications: 85.4%
  • Searching for information or technical help: 49.9%
  • Interpreting, analyzing, translating, or summarizing documents: 44.6%
  • Information processing, paperwork, or filing: 34.7%

Exposure and observed usage are separate measures and neither equals job loss. Census BTOS figures are business-level surveys and are not occupation-specific. Sources: GPTs are GPTs occupation exposure; Microsoft Working with AI: AI applicability; OECD AI Exposure Measure (AI Capability Gap); Anthropic Economic Index; Census BTOS Core AI Use; Census BTOS AI Supplement 2025-26. These figures do not affect Job Market Health scores. Explore AI & Jobs · How we use AI data.

Sources and methodology

The datasets behind the figures on this page

Job Market Health score
Score for reference month August 2026 · methodology v1.0 · MethodologyScore last recalculated Oct 2, 2026 · First published Sep 29, 2026
BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
Employment, wages and largest metros · OEWS May 2025 · publisher release May 15, 2026 · About this sourceRetrieved Sep 17, 2026
BLS Employment Projections
Projected growth, openings, education and training · BLS Employment Projections 2025-2035 · publisher release Aug 27, 2026 · About this sourceRetrieved Sep 17, 2026
O*NET
Skills, alternate titles and related occupations · O*NET 31.0 Database · publisher release date not verified · About this sourceRetrieved Oct 19, 2026

Values marked “Not published” are suppressed or not published by the source. We leave them blank rather than estimating them. Pipeline status for every source is on Data Status.

Related occupations

O*NET® lists these occupations as related. Each link opens the same published view of score, wages and outlook.

Database ArchitectsComputer Systems AnalystsNetwork And Computer Systems AdministratorsSoftware DevelopersComputer Occupations, All OtherInformation Security Analysts

Evidence record

JobMarketHealth derived indicator; not a government statistic. The composite score is national and occupation level.

Occupation
Database administrators
SOC code
15-1242
Geography
United States
Reference month
August 2026
Published Job Market Health score
27 / 100
Restated score
27 / 100
Band
Weak
Current Demand component
31 / 10050% weight
Occupation Fundamentals component
25 / 10030% weight
Long-Term Outlook component
18 / 10020% weight
Confidence
HighAt least 90% of required inputs and occupation-industry mapping are covered.
Methodology version
v1.0
Source vintage: Annual
EP-2025-2035|CPS-25b-2025|OEWS-2020-2025
Source vintage: Monthly calculated at
2026-10-02T15:32:05.097Z
First published at
Sep 29, 2026
Recalculated at
Oct 2, 2026
Canonical record URL
https://jobmarkethealth.com/occupations/database-administrators#evidence-record
Derived by
JobMarketHealth

MethodologyBLS JOLTSBLS CESBLS Employment ProjectionsHow to citeNational Job Market Health release, August 2026

Keep going

Learn how to judge a market from these numbers in how to tell if a job market is healthy, or why projected growth and annual openings often disagree in projected growth vs projected annual openings. Coverage, revisions and limits are explained on about the data.

The datasets behind these figures, and what each one can and cannot show, are set out on data sources.